samsung a53 vs moto g stylus

 The initial ruling on the Samsung a53 versus the Moto g stylus is that the Moto g stylus wins slightly. The a53 is a little more refined. But it seems like Samsung or somebody is doing stuff that makes the thing not quite as easy to use. Plus some of my apps don't perform certain features properly that have worked on every other phone I've tried them on. So I will press on with the a53 because I love Samsung. It may be that they're trying to hard, putting in their own features that somehow don't quite meet my needs. But also there's one Bible app that simply doesn't do a feature properly that all my other phones do. Also the text to speech seems kind of weird it isn't clear why the quality seems similar but old or something. Now the a53 is a little faster. And it appears that my phone service has figured out how to improve my network performance. So the a53 is definitely faster, both doing downloads and using the phone locally, meaning running apps and things that don't require the internet. The Moto g stylus is slightly bigger, which is nice. The a53 phone camera is better. So the a53 is overall a better phone, but the Moto g stylus would be just fine, and the Moto g stylus is less expensive. In my case I paid 33% less for it. In other words the a53 was 50% more. Percentages are so weird. Why are the percentages different depending on your perspective. If you could get into heaven based on percentages, we would just need to look at it from God's perspective.